Main Page

From Wikimarcellus

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Revision as of 19:47, 7 April 2011
Tcopley (Talk | contribs)
(Companies Actively Drilling)
← Previous diff
Current revision
Tcopley (Talk | contribs)
(Universities And Research Institutes - Ohio State University - Subsurface Energy Resource Center)
Line 73: Line 73:
* '''''Update #8''''': By October, 2010, PDEP was reporting that 1,099 Marcellus shale wells had been drilled in Pennsylvania from January 1 through September 30, 2010. This number had grown to 1,257 by mid-November. This represented 2,395 Marcellus wells overall that had been drilled since the start of the play. * '''''Update #8''''': By October, 2010, PDEP was reporting that 1,099 Marcellus shale wells had been drilled in Pennsylvania from January 1 through September 30, 2010. This number had grown to 1,257 by mid-November. This represented 2,395 Marcellus wells overall that had been drilled since the start of the play.
 +
 +* '''''Update #9''''': The final tally for permits issued during 2010 in Pennsylvania was 3,314 with over 1,000 wells drilled. As of April, 2011, 590 permits had been issued year-to-date and 300 wells drilled.
 +
 +* '''''Update #10''''': A final PDEP tally for 2011 indicated over 2,200 producing Marcellus shale wells in Pennsylvania--that is, 500 more producing than in the first half of the year. Production was 40% higher during the second half of the year than in the earlier reporting period. Pennsylvania Marcellus production amounted to roughly 1.04 Tcf during 2011. Several companies announced production cut-backs due to the very low prices of natural gas.
 +
 +* '''''Update #11''''': During 2010, 1,644 Marcellus shale wells were drilled in Pennsylvania. In 2011, an additional 2,046 were drilled. The rate of drilling appeared to be slowing in 2012 due to a continuation of depressed natural gas prices.
====Companies Actively Drilling==== ====Companies Actively Drilling====
Line 104: Line 110:
* [[EQT Corporation]] * [[EQT Corporation]]
* [[EXCO Resources, Inc]] * [[EXCO Resources, Inc]]
 +* [[Exxon Mobil Corp]]
* [[Flatirons Resources LLC]] * [[Flatirons Resources LLC]]
* [[Fortuna Energy Inc]] * [[Fortuna Energy Inc]]
Line 123: Line 130:
* [[National Fuel]] * [[National Fuel]]
* [[Newfield Exploration Co]] * [[Newfield Exploration Co]]
 +* [[Noble Energy Inc]]
* [[Norse Energy]] * [[Norse Energy]]
* [[North Coast Energy]] * [[North Coast Energy]]
Line 160: Line 168:
* [[Victory Energy Corporation]] * [[Victory Energy Corporation]]
* [[Vista Resources]] * [[Vista Resources]]
 +* [[Waco Oil & Gas]]
* [[XTO Energy]] * [[XTO Energy]]
</div> </div>
Line 184: Line 193:
* [[Epic Energy Resources]] * [[Epic Energy Resources]]
* [[Everest Exploration Co, LLC]] * [[Everest Exploration Co, LLC]]
-* [[Exxon Mobil Corp]] 
* [[GFI Oil & Gas]] * [[GFI Oil & Gas]]
* [[Great Lakes Energy Partners]] * [[Great Lakes Energy Partners]]
Line 243: Line 251:
* [[Conquest Seismic Services]] * [[Conquest Seismic Services]]
* [[Contractor Services of West Virginia]] * [[Contractor Services of West Virginia]]
 +* [[Crestwood Marcellus Midstream LLC]]
* [[Dawson Geophysical Co]] * [[Dawson Geophysical Co]]
* [[Delphi Midstream Partners, LLC]] * [[Delphi Midstream Partners, LLC]]
Line 248: Line 257:
* [[Dominion Transmission Inc.]] * [[Dominion Transmission Inc.]]
* [[Dunn’s Tank Service]] * [[Dunn’s Tank Service]]
 +* [[Earth Data Northeast, Inc]]
* [[Ecosphere Technologies]] * [[Ecosphere Technologies]]
* [[El Paso Corporation]] * [[El Paso Corporation]]
Line 297: Line 307:
* [[NGP Midstream & Resources LP]] * [[NGP Midstream & Resources LP]]
* [[NiSource]] * [[NiSource]]
 +* [[Nittany Extraction Technologies, LLC]]
* [[Object Reservoir, Inc]] * [[Object Reservoir, Inc]]
* [[Oildex]] * [[Oildex]]
Line 306: Line 317:
* [[Prochemtech]] * [[Prochemtech]]
* [[PUMPCO Energy Services, Inc]] * [[PUMPCO Energy Services, Inc]]
 +* [[Purestream Technology]]
* [[Rain for Rent]] * [[Rain for Rent]]
* [[Reserved Environmental Services]] * [[Reserved Environmental Services]]
Line 357: Line 369:
<div style="column-count:3;-moz-column-count:3;-webkit-column-count:3"> <div style="column-count:3;-moz-column-count:3;-webkit-column-count:3">
* [[Appalachia Shale Water Conservation and Management Committee]] * [[Appalachia Shale Water Conservation and Management Committee]]
 +* [[Energy In Depth - Northeast Marcellus Initiative]]
 +* [[FracFocus]]
* [[Gas Technology Institute]] * [[Gas Technology Institute]]
* [[Independent Oil and Gas Association of New York]] * [[Independent Oil and Gas Association of New York]]
Line 425: Line 439:
* [[Keystone College - GATES Program]] * [[Keystone College - GATES Program]]
* [[Lackawanna College - Gas Technology Program]] * [[Lackawanna College - Gas Technology Program]]
 +* [[Ohio State University - Subsurface Energy Resource Center]]
* [[Pennsylvania College of Technology]] * [[Pennsylvania College of Technology]]
* Penn State * Penn State
Line 453: Line 468:
<div style="column-count:3;-moz-column-count:3;-webkit-column-count:3"> <div style="column-count:3;-moz-column-count:3;-webkit-column-count:3">
* [[Appalachian Producer Services]] * [[Appalachian Producer Services]]
 +* [[Bentek Energy]]
* [[Cambridge Energy Research Associates]] * [[Cambridge Energy Research Associates]]
* [[Charles Ryan Associates]] * [[Charles Ryan Associates]]
Line 475: Line 491:
* [[DrillN Man|Drill'N Man]] * [[DrillN Man|Drill'N Man]]
* [[Energy In Depth]] * [[Energy In Depth]]
 +* [[Facts of the Day]]
* [[Flowback]] * [[Flowback]]
* [[Fractracker]] * [[Fractracker]]
Line 480: Line 497:
* [[MarcellusFacts.com]] * [[MarcellusFacts.com]]
* [[Marcellus Shale Formation]] * [[Marcellus Shale Formation]]
 +* [[PA Shale Gas Blog]]
 +* [[Shale Environmental Technology Review]]
* [[The Marcellus Effect]] * [[The Marcellus Effect]]
* [[MSC Newsroom]] * [[MSC Newsroom]]
Line 487: Line 506:
* [[Pennsylvania Council of Professional Geologists]] * [[Pennsylvania Council of Professional Geologists]]
 +* [[Pittsburgh Geological Society]]
=== Utica Shale (US) === === Utica Shale (US) ===
Line 504: Line 524:
* [[Epsilon Energy Ltd]] * [[Epsilon Energy Ltd]]
* [[Equitable Resources|EQT Corporation]] * [[Equitable Resources|EQT Corporation]]
 +* [[EV Energy Partners]]
* [[Forest Oil Corporation]] * [[Forest Oil Corporation]]
* [[Gastem]] * [[Gastem]]
Line 520: Line 541:
* [[RJK Explorations]] * [[RJK Explorations]]
* [[Talisman Energy Inc]] * [[Talisman Energy Inc]]
 +* [[Total E&P USA, Inc]]
* [[Covalent Energy|Utica Energy]] * [[Covalent Energy|Utica Energy]]
</div> </div>
Line 529: Line 551:
* [[Mooncor Oil & Gas Corp|DRGN Energy Inc]] * [[Mooncor Oil & Gas Corp|DRGN Energy Inc]]
* [[Empire Energy USA LLC]] * [[Empire Energy USA LLC]]
-* [[EV Energy Partners]] 
* [[Gulfport Energy Corp]] * [[Gulfport Energy Corp]]
* [[J.A.G. Mines Ltd]] * [[J.A.G. Mines Ltd]]
Line 568: Line 589:
* [[Chesapeake Energy]] * [[Chesapeake Energy]]
* [[Continental Resources]] * [[Continental Resources]]
 +* [[Magnum Hunter Resources Corp]]
</div> </div>

Current revision

Contents

WikiMarcellus -- Marcellus Shale and Other Appalachian Plays

Trenton-Black River (TBR)

The Trenton-Black River (TBR) is a geological formation. It extends underneath the Appalachian Basin, from Kentucky through Ohio, West Virginia and Pennsylvania and into upstate New York and the Provinces of southwestern Ontario and southern Quebec.

Contracting note: One can obtain an interest in TBR that would be separate from Marcellus Shale and other sections.

Companies Actively Drilling

Reported Leasing Land

Drilling Hotspots

Marcellus Shale (MS)

During 2008, very active leasing activity took place in the first half of the year by companies speculating on eventual production of prolific amounts of natural gas from the Marcellus shale. It was part of a larger development of shale oil and gas plays throughout North America sometimes referred to as the shale sweepstakes. There are still many research issues related to the exploration of this formation. During the first half of 2009, leasing activity had been greatly reduced, as natural-gas prices fell around one-third from January until early July, and due to the on-going economic meltdown. Nevertheless, most of the companies were at least continuing their reconnaissance of prospective areas and a few had even increased planned drilling. During 2009, natgas production from the Marcellus shale rose from virtually nothing to about 1% of total U.S. production.

In excess of twenty major oil and gas companies had invested over $700 million during 2008 in developing the Marcellus Shale play. Up to half of the total was in Pennsylvania with New York State in second place. Gas exploration and production in the US had been shifting to the Marcellus and Barnett shales due to higher yields that were possible, availability of pipeline capacity, and the closeness of the fields to large metropolitan markets. These factors made the Marcellus and Barnett plays more profitable when compared to other alternatives.

Investment continued during 2009, but on a much reduced scale than had originally been planned due to a gas glut, less than favorable economic conditions and unfolding environmental concerns about drilling. Despite these overall restraining influences, according to one (possibly optimistic) estimate 800 Marcellus wells were expected to be drilled during 2009; that would represent an increase of more than 400% over the previous year.

  • Update #1: A mid-October report noted that 184 horizontal drilling permits were issued in September, 2009 alone compared to 91 in August. The largest number of permits had been issued in the Pennsylvania counties of Bradford (36), Clinton (15), Greene (14), Lackawanna (11), Lycoming (14) Tioga (31) and Washington (23).
  • Update #2: As of October 30, 2009 Pennsylvania's DEP had issued 1,592 Marcellus drilling permits year-to-date. This compares to only 476 for the entire year of 2008. Through the end of October, 433 Marcellus shale wells had been drilled during 2009 in Pennsylvania. That was more than double the 195 wells drilled the entire previous year. Over one third of the permitting activity had been in the three northeastern Pennsylvania counties of Bradford, Susquehanna, and Tioga.
  • Update #3: According to a mid-November, 2009 report 50 rigs were in the process of working the Marcellus shale.
  • Update #4: 741 Marcellus shale wells were drilled in Pennsylvania during in 2009. 1,350 new wells were expected in 2010.
  • Update #5: Weak natural gas prices and oversupply continued from 2009 into the first half of 2010.
  • Update #6: A July, 2010 report, quoting PDEP, gave the following Marcellus shale growth stats:
Year           # wells        #wells
               drilled     permitted
2008             196           519
2009             763         1,985
2010 (thru June) 564         1,172
  • Update #7: A news item in October, 2010 noted that 1,681 Marcellus shale wells had been drilled by mid-2010 with production of 1.4 Bcf/d. 101 drilling rigs had been deployed in the formation. Leading counties in the play were:
Southwest             Northeast
County   # wells      County    # wells
Washington  259       Bradford    309
Greene      150       Tioga       261
                      Susquehanna 134
  • Update #8: By October, 2010, PDEP was reporting that 1,099 Marcellus shale wells had been drilled in Pennsylvania from January 1 through September 30, 2010. This number had grown to 1,257 by mid-November. This represented 2,395 Marcellus wells overall that had been drilled since the start of the play.
  • Update #9: The final tally for permits issued during 2010 in Pennsylvania was 3,314 with over 1,000 wells drilled. As of April, 2011, 590 permits had been issued year-to-date and 300 wells drilled.
  • Update #10: A final PDEP tally for 2011 indicated over 2,200 producing Marcellus shale wells in Pennsylvania--that is, 500 more producing than in the first half of the year. Production was 40% higher during the second half of the year than in the earlier reporting period. Pennsylvania Marcellus production amounted to roughly 1.04 Tcf during 2011. Several companies announced production cut-backs due to the very low prices of natural gas.
  • Update #11: During 2010, 1,644 Marcellus shale wells were drilled in Pennsylvania. In 2011, an additional 2,046 were drilled. The rate of drilling appeared to be slowing in 2012 due to a continuation of depressed natural gas prices.

Companies Actively Drilling

Reported Leasing Land

Support Companies and Organizations

Environmental and Non-governmental Orgainzations

Industry Organizations

Engineering and Environmental Consultants

Governmental Organizations

Landholders & Landowners' Groups

Landowners' Coalitions
Landowners' Services

Universities And Research Institutes

Gas Industry Publications

Broadcasts

Consulting Organizations

Online/Social Networking Resources

Blogs

Professional Organizations

Utica Shale (US)

The Utica shale is located in central New York State and stretches north to the Province of Quebec, Canada. There is far less heard about it than the Marcellus shale, because the latter is a much larger formation stretching across several states.

Companies Actively Drilling

Reported Leasing Land

Support Companies and Organizations

Huron Shale (HS)

The Huron shale is a play spanning the tri-state area of Southern West Virginia, Eastern Kentucky and Western Virginia. It is shallower than the Marcellus shale at the 4000 or 5000 feet level. Most of the wells in this formation are horizontal ones.

Companies Actively Drilling

Reported Leasing Land

North Carolina shales

North Carolina's shale formations including the Dan River Basin and the Deep River Basin of Central North Carolina are so far virtually untapped, but may hold reservoirs capable of eventual commercial gas production.

Personal tools