Global Geophysical Services
From Wikimarcellus
(Difference between revisions)
| Revision as of 02:20, 22 November 2010 Tcopley (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff |
Current revision Tcopley (Talk | contribs) (cat) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| Global was in the news in November, 2010 when it was defendant in two federal lawsuits in Pittsburgh, PA filed by Fayette County, PA landowners. Danell Pepson claimed the company had reneged on an agreement to conduct a seismic survey on her land. The second suit involved the company having allegedly conducted seismic work without first gaining permission from landowners. The company's response was not provided in the news account. | Global was in the news in November, 2010 when it was defendant in two federal lawsuits in Pittsburgh, PA filed by Fayette County, PA landowners. Danell Pepson claimed the company had reneged on an agreement to conduct a seismic survey on her land. The second suit involved the company having allegedly conducted seismic work without first gaining permission from landowners. The company's response was not provided in the news account. | ||
| - | [[Category:Support, geophysics]] [[Category:Pennsylvania]] [[Category:Southwestern PA]] [[Category:Fayette County]] [[Category:Marcellus shale]] | + | [[Category:Support, geophysics]] [[Category:Public]] [[Category:Listed-NYSE]] [[Category:Pennsylvania]] [[Category:Southwestern PA]] [[Category:Fayette County]] [[Category:Marcellus shale]] |
Current revision
Here is where some info about Global Geophysical Services should go. This article is still a stub and needs your attention. It does not have a template and contains minimal information. Please dive in and help it grow!
Missouri City, Texas-based Global Geophysical Services Inc. (NYSE:GGS) is a provider of 3-D seismic services.
Global was in the news in November, 2010 when it was defendant in two federal lawsuits in Pittsburgh, PA filed by Fayette County, PA landowners. Danell Pepson claimed the company had reneged on an agreement to conduct a seismic survey on her land. The second suit involved the company having allegedly conducted seismic work without first gaining permission from landowners. The company's response was not provided in the news account.
